goods and service tax

Copy Page

Published on 10 April 2025

Understanding Appeals, Revisions, and Reviews Under GST Law

Introduction

This chapter discusses the concepts of Appeals, Revisions, and Reviews within the framework of the GST law. It outlines the understanding of these mechanisms, relevant legal provisions, and recent case law.

Understanding Appeals

An Appeal refers to the process through which parties aggrieved by decisions or orders issued under the CGST or SGST Act can seek further review by Appellate Authorities. It effectively reopens the proceedings for comprehensive reassessment.

Revision and Review

Revision

Revision entails re-examining decisions to rectify defects or provide relief against improper or irregular jurisdiction exercises. Under Section 264 of the Act, a Commissioner may initiate a suo moto revision. Additionally, Section 263 enables the Commissioner to review orders deemed erroneous or detrimental to revenue interests.

Review

A Review involves re-evaluating prior decisions with the goal of improving or correcting them.

Appeals Under Section 107

Key Provisions

  • Section 107 states that individuals aggrieved by decisions under the CGST or SGST Acts may appeal to the prescribed Appellate Authority within three months from the communication date of the decision.
  • However, Section 121 specifies that no appeal shall be permissible against decisions relating to:
    1. Orders directing the transfer of proceedings from one jurisdiction to another.
    2. Orders for the seizure or retention of financial documents.
    3. Orders sanctioning prosecutions or actions under Section 80.

Thus, orders under this section are final and binding per Sections 108, 133, 117, and 118.

Case Law Referencing Section 107

SUJEET JAISWAL versus UNION OF INDIA

  • W.P.T No.3 of 2021, Date: January 21, 2021
  • Hon’ble Justice P. Sam Koshy oversaw the case where a petition for condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 107 was dismissed due to limitation issues.
  • The Appellate Authority can only condone delays up to an additional 30 days as per the Limitation Act. The initial order was dated January 15, 2018, making the extended filing deadline January 15, 2019. Any appeals filed beyond this period could not be considered, indicating that the authority becomes functus officio post the designated period.
  • The court found no substantial grounds for interference in the Respondent's dismissal of the petition.

M/S KRISHNA INTERNATIONAL versus COMMISSIONER, DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX

  • W.P(C) 6231/2020, Date: September 11, 2020
  • The court reiterated that petitions related to orders under Section 107 should not be entertained when alternative remedies exist. The petitioner may pursue an appeal before the appropriate authority. Additionally, a refund claim of Rs. 7,68,938 was to be decided by the respondents within three weeks, with proper notice to the involved parties.

M/S NANJUNDAPPA TRADING COMPANY AND ANOTHER versus STATE OF U.P

  • Date: September 23, 2020
  • Hon’ble Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra discussed the pre-deposit requirements related to appeal maintainability under Section 112(8). The petitioner agreed to deposit an additional 20% of the disputed tax to comply with statutory requirements within three weeks.

Conclusion

This chapter emphasizes the structured approach to Appeals and Revisions under the GST laws, supported by relevant case law. Understanding the timelines and limitations is crucial for effective legal recourse.

Share: